Despite its socioeconomic benefits and its role in mitigating climate change, nuclear power has a challenging reputation in a post-Fukushima world. Why is this and what can the industry do to change it?
Nuclear energy is the largest source of low-carbon electricity in advanced economies. Over the past 50 years, its use has avoided the emission of over 60 gigatonnes of CO2 , equivalent to almost two years’ worth of global energy-related emissions1/. In addition to its role in mitigating climate change, nuclear energy contributes to clean air by avoiding the emission of particulates and other pollutants. It does all this whilst working in a reliable, predictable and costeffective manner. Furthermore, nuclear energy creates many local, long-term, high-quality jobs, as well as significant trickle-down socioeconomic benefits, important in the context of the post-COVID recovery2/. Yet, despite all of this, public perception continues to be an issue for the industry, with concerns about safety and nuclear waste overshadowing all other accomplishments.
In contrast to what happened during the Chornobyl accident, the nuclear industry released huge amounts of data and information during the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear accident. And yet, in an era of 24/7 news coverage and information proliferation, which gives everyone the ability to promote their own views on the Internet, this higher level of transparency still failed to gain the trust of the general public.