HTGR Knowledge Base
Conference Article: Impact of increasing MHTGR power on passive heat removal
Dunn, T.D.; Schwartz, A.A.; Silady, F.A. (General Atomics, San Diego, CA (United States))Abstract
In 1990 a cost reduction study recommended that the reference U.S. MHTGR module design be changed to an 84-column, 450 MW(t) annular reactor core to attain improved economics with the same high level of safety as the previous reference 66-column, 360 MW(t) MHTGR module. The objective of this paper is to report on a recently completed core configuration trade study that reviewed the basis for that recommendation with more detailed assessments. The trade study examined alternate core configurations in terms of the size, shape, and power level. Core configurations at 450 MW(t), an alternative at higher power, and one at lower power were considered. These alternatives represented the maximum achievable power for fuel element for two different reactor vessel sizes. Fuel, reactor internal and vessel temperatures during pressurized and depressurized conduction cooldown transients are presented and compared to limits. Based on the need to improve economics without sacrificing the MHTGR's high level of safety, the trade study confirmed that the previously selected 84-column, 450 MW(t) annular design remains the preferable configuration.
view the full text of this article (7 pages, format: PDF, size= 1019kB)
key words: Gas Cooled Reactor, Nuclear Technology
- Reference:
- Specialists meeting on decay heat removal and heat transfer under normal and
accident conditions in gas cooled reactors. Juelich (Germany). 6-8 Jul 1992
- International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna (Austria)
- IAEA-TECDOC--757, pp:83-89
- International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna (Austria)
