Unit Capability Factor
(UCF)
The purpose of this indicator is to monitor progress in attaining high unit and industry energy production reliability. This indicator reflects effectiveness of plant programs and practices in maximizing available electrical generation, and provides an overall indication of how well plants are operated and maintained.
The unit capability factor is determined for each period as shown below:
| Value of a unit, | UCF (%) = | (REG - PEL - UEL) x 100 % |
| REG |
Note: The total planned energy loss for the period is the sum of the losses from all planned events.
Note: The total unplanned energy loss for the period is the sum of the losses from all unplanned events.
Data for new units is included in the calculation of industry values beginning January 1 of the first calendar year following commercial operation.
(1) Subtracting the actual power level during the event from the power level immediately prior to the event when the power was at or near the reference power level,
(2) Computing the power level reduction that would have occurred with the unit at the reference power level, or
(3) Using historical data from similar events occurring at the reference power level.
The same rule may be used if the change in the start date is decided by plant management, assuming this decision is due to all of the following reasons or circumstances:
The unit is operating in a deregulated environment, and the management decision to modify the planned outage start date is solely to take advantage of economic situations to maximize, on a short term basis, the economic benefit coming from selling the plant electricity output.
This economic benefit can be applied to the entire production system of the Utility, not only to the specific unit under consideration.
The following examples and the accompanying power history plot are provided to illustrate methods used in calculating the unit capability factor and the unplanned capability loss factor for a plant under a variety of common situations. The time periods referenced in the example refer to points labeled on the power history plot.
It is assumed that this unit has a maximum power output of 1 000 MW(e) under optimum ambient conditions (determined by a formal test). Correction of test results to reference ambient conditions resulted in the reference capacity value of 985 MW(e).
(985 MW(e)) x (8 760 hours) = 8 628 600 MW(e).h
| Time Period | Description |
| 1 - 2 | Power reduction of 100 MW(e) for 12 hours due to circulating water pump failure. The unit was operating at reduced power due to a load following at the time of the pump failure. The power reduction caused by this failure would have been 201 MW(e) if the failure had occurred at the reference power level. |
| UEL = 201 x 12 = 2 412 MW(e).h Unplanned | |
| 2 - 3 | Reduced power operation due to ambient conditions and fuel coast down. The lost energy generation is not used in calculations. |
| 3 - 4 | Planned refueling outage. Scheduled length was 45 days (1 080 hours). The outage begins on the scheduled date. |
| PEL = 985 x 1 080 = 1 063 800 MW(e).h Planned | |
| 4 - 5 | Outage extension of 10 days (240 hours) beyond scheduled length to complete all work scheduled for the outage. |
| UEL = 985 x 240 = 236 400 MW(e).h Unplanned | |
| 5 - 6 | Power ramp-up following outage. Average power level of 495 MW(e) for three days (72 hours). |
| PEL = (985 - 495) x 72 = 35 280 MW(e).h Planned | |
| 6 - 7 | Operation above reference unit capacity due to very cold cooling water. The additional energy generation is not used in calculations. |
| 7 - 8 | Shutdown for 32 hours due to reactor scram caused by personnel error. |
| UEL = 985 x 32 = 31 520 MW(e).h Unplanned | |
| 8 - 9 | Power ramp-up following the scram. Average power level of 490 MW(e) for 8 hours. |
| 9 - 10 | Operation below reference unit capacity due to environmental limitations only. The lost energy generation is not used in calculations. |
| Time Period | Energy Loss MW(e).h |
|
| Total planned energy loss (PEL) | 3 - 4 | 1 063 800 |
| 5 - 6 | 35 280 | |
| 1 099 080 | ||
| Total unplanned energy loss (UEL) | 1 - 2 | 2 412 |
| 4 - 5 | 2236 400 | |
| 7 - 8 | 31 520 | |
| 8 - 9 | 3 960 | |
| 274 292 | ||
| Unit Capability Factor (UCF) | = | (REG - PEL - UEL) x 100% |
| REG | ||
| = | (8 628 600 - 1 099 080 - 274 292) x 100% | |
| 8 628 600 | ||
| = | 84.1% |
| Unplanned Capability Loss Factor (UCL) | = | UEL x 100% |
| REG | ||
| = | 274 292 x 100% | |
| 8 628 600 | ||
| = | 3.2% |
* This calculation is provided for use with the Unplanned Capability Loss Factor detailed description.
| 0 - 1 | Reduced power due to load following |
| 1 - 2 | Reduced power due to equipment failure |
| 2 - 3 | Reduced power due to ambient conditions and fuel coast-down |
| 3 - 6 | Unit shutdown (outage) and subsequent ramp-up |
| 6 - 7 | Increased power due to very cold water |
| 7 - 9 | Unit shutdown (operator error) and subsequent ramp-up |
| 9 - 10 | Reduced power due to environmental limitations not under management control |
|
|
|
| This page was automatically created on 10 Feb 2012, 04:02:12 | |